Bu kaydın yasal hükümlere uygun olmadığını düşünüyorsanız lütfen sayfa sonundaki Hata Bildir bağlantısını takip ederek bildirimde bulununuz. Kayıtlar ilgili üniversite yöneticileri tarafından eklenmektedir. Nadiren de olsa kayıtlarla ilgili hatalar oluşabilmektedir. MİTOS internet üzerindeki herhangi bir ödev sitesi değildir!

Pre-face to Derrida:Tryst with the Copula

BROWSE_DETAIL_TITLE_ALTERNATE: Derida için Önsöz:Koşaç ile Buluşma

BROWSE_DETAIL_IDENTIFIER_SECTION

BROWSE_DETAIL_TYPE: Article

BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLISH_STATE: Published

BROWSE_DETAIL_FORMAT: PDF Document

BROWSE_DETAIL_LANG: English

BROWSE_DETAIL_CREATORS: Kona, Prakash (Author),

BROWSE_DETAIL_CONTRIBUTERS:


BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLISHER: Atılım Üniversitesi BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLICATION_NAME: Atılım Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLICATION_LOCATION: Ankara BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLICATION_DATE: 30-05-2011 BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLICATION_NUMBER: 1 BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLICATION_VOLUME: 1 BROWSE_DETAIL_PUBLICATION_PAGE: 7-26


BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_FILE:
file show file
BROWSE_DETAIL_SHOW_FILE
download file
BROWSE_DETAIL_SAVE_FILE

BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_KEYWORDS Deconstruction, philosophy, difference, copula, otherness.----Yapıbozumculuk,felsefe,farklılık,koşaç,ötekilik.
BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_ABSTRACT In this essay I wish to “introduce” Derrida by giving a preface to his philosophy. But Derrida’s entire contention rests on the premise that philosophy can only be prefaced since it lacks an original face or meaning. Since his own work is a to philosophy, the preface that I intend to give is twice-removed from the original preface that Derrida offers readers.Briefly this is Derrida\\'s tryst with the copula:the copula or the connector,something that is not taken seriously but is in fact the basis of construction of meaning.What is the copula?Historically,it is a philosophical expression of various marginal groups that were not taken into consideration.In the context of Spivak\\'s preface to Derrida\\'s Of Grammatology,my preface is one level further removed from reality.What is philosophy \\"ultimately\\"except a tryst with the preface(that connects the reader with the author)or the copula!Can we take hard-line positions both at the methodological level and in how we interpret data-this is the Derridean paradox,that we can\\'t take such positions without being aware that they\\'re positions.The copula in its shifting state as floating signifier plays the role of a Zen master constantly teasing meaning trapped in cages of words that we attribute to situations.The discourses of humanities and social sciences are replete with examples to situations.The discourses of humanities and social sciences are replete with examples of over-meanings by which I mean that research scholars tend to take positions that are absolute and use those positions to interpret reality.Things mean more than What they actually could be because we impose our positions on them without claiming that they\\'re positions.To be aware of the class,race,gender and other biases inherent in our positions liberates the text from the clutches of totality and opens to meaning the doors of infinity----Bu makalede Derrida\\\'nın felsefesine bir önsöz oluşturarak,Derrida\\\'nın felsefesini \\\"tanıtmayı\\\"amaçlıyorum.Ancak derrida\\\'nın tartışmasının tümü,özgün bir çehre ve anlamdan yoksun olan felsefenin sadece önsözünün yazılabileceği fikrine dayanır.
BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_TOC
BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_DESCRIPTION
BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_RIGHTS
BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_NOTES

BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_REFERENCES


BROWSE_DETAIL_TAB_REFERENCED_BYS

BROWSE_DETAIL_GOTO_LIST

 

TEXT_STATS

  • TEXT_RECORD_STATS
    • TEXT_STATS_THIS_MONTH: 0
    • TEXT_STATS_TOTAL: 2414
  • TEXT_ONLINE_STATS
    • TEXT_ONLINE_STATS_TOTALONLINEVISITOR: 13
    • TEXT_ONLINE_STATS_TOTALONLINEUSER: 0
    • TEXT_STATS_TOTAL: 13

LINK_STATS