Bu kaydın yasal hükümlere uygun olmadığını düşünüyorsanız lütfen sayfa sonundaki Hata Bildir bağlantısını takip ederek bildirimde bulununuz. Kayıtlar ilgili üniversite yöneticileri tarafından eklenmektedir. Nadiren de olsa kayıtlarla ilgili hatalar oluşabilmektedir. MİTOS internet üzerindeki herhangi bir ödev sitesi değildir!

THE CONTRIBUTION OF FORM AND MEANING FOCUSED TRANSLATION INSTRUCTION TO ELT STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION

Diğer Başlık: YAPI VE ANLAM ODAKLI ÇEVİRİ ÖĞRETİMİNİN İNGİLİZCE DİLİ EĞİTİMİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN OKUMA ALGILARINA KATKISI

Oluşturulma Tarihi: 16-06-2015

Niteleme Bilgileri

Tür: Makale

Yayınlanma Durumu: Yayınlanmış

Dosya Biçimi: Dosya Yok

Dil: İngilizce

Konu(lar): EĞİTİM,

Yazar(lar): KÖSE, Serhan (Yazar), ERTAŞ, Abdullah (Yazar),

Emeği Geçen(ler):




Dosya:
Dosya Yok

Anahtar Kelimeler

translation, reading, form, meaning, çeviri, okuma, yapı, anlam


Özet

Abstract: Reading is a dominant skill in translating. This study investigates if the reading skills of the trainees influence translating and which of the instruction, form or meaning focused translation instruction, is more effective in improving the reading skills of ELT students. The subject pool for the study consisted of 75 undergraduate students who have taken the Translation (from English to Turkish) at the Department of English Language Teaching, Gazi University: 40 for the experimental group, and 35 for the control group. The subjects took the Translation course for 10 weeks in the first term of the 2009-2010 academic year. As a result of the study it can be said that both groups improved their reading skills but the trainees in the experimental group which received meaning focused translation instruction showed better improvement than the control group.

Özet: Okuma becerisi çeviride baskın bir beceridir. Bu araştırmada öğretmen adaylarının okuma becerisi seviyesi çeviri becerisini ne seviyede etkilediği ve yapı ve anlam odaklı çeviri öğretiminden hangisinin okuma becerisine katkısı daha fazla olduğu araştırılmıştır. Araştırmaya Gazi Üniversitesi İngiliz Dili Eğitimi A.B.D.‟daki 75 öğrenci iştirak etmiştir: denek grubu 40, kontrol grubu 35 adaydan oluşmaktadır. Araştırma 2009-2010 akademik yılında 10 hafta sürmüştür. Araştırmanın sonucuna göre her iki gruptaki adaylar okuma becerilerini geliştirmiştir fakat anlam odaklı çeviri öğretimi alan denek grubundaki adaylar okuma becerilerini kontrol grubundaki adaylardan daha fazla geliştirmiştir.


İçindekiler



Açıklamalar



Haklar

BUCA EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ 30 (2011)


Notlar



KaynakçaReferencesBasnett-McGuire, S. (1998). Researching Translation Studies. In P. Bush & K. Malmkjaer(Eds.), Rimbaud’s Rainbow: Literary Translation in Higher Education (pp. 105-118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar ofSpoken and Written English. Harlow.Boguslawa, W. (2003). Reading for Translation: Investigating the Process of ForeignLanguage Text Comprehension from an Information Processing Perspective. StudiaAnglica Posnaniensia: International Review of English Studies. Retrieved 13 January2010, http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Reading+for+translation%3a+investigating+the+process+of+foreign...-a0116930311.Carreres, A. (2006). "Strange Bedfellows: Translation and Language Teaching. The Teachingof Translation into L2 in Modern Languages Degrees: Uses and Limitations". InSixth Symposium on Translation, Terminology and Interpretation in Cuba andCanada. La Habana, December 2006. Canadian Translators, Terminologists andInterpreters Council (online).Catford, J. C. (1969). A Linguistic Theory of Translation. London: Oxford University Press.Chastain, K. (1988b). Developing Second Language Skills. Theory to Practice. 219, 222, 224,25, 31, ( 3rd ed. ). U.S.A.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.19Chau, S. C. (1984). How to translate “This is a red rose”.The grammatical, cultural andinterpretive aspects of translation teaching. In W. Wilss & G. Thome (Eds.), DieTheorie des Ubersetzens und ihr Aufschlugwert fur die Ubersetzungs- undDolinetschdidaktik [Translation theory and its relevance for the teaching of translationand interpretation] (pp. 124-133). Tubingen, F.R.G.: Gunter Narr.Clarke, M., & Silberstein, S. (1977). Toward a Realization of Psycholinguistic Principles inthe ESL Reading Class. Language Learning, 27(1), 135-154.Coady, J. (1980). A Psycholinguistic Model of the ESL Reader. In Reading in a SecondLanguage: Hypotheses, Organization, and Practice. 12. Eds. R. Mckay & Barkman,R.R. Jordan. Rowley / Mas.: Newbury House Publishers Inc.Colina, S. (2002). Second language acquisition, language teaching and translation studies. TheTranslator, 8, 1-24.Doyle, M. (1991). Translation and the space between: Operative parameters of an enterprise.In Mildred Larson (ed.), 13-26.Ellis, R.(2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar. TESOL Quarterly,40(1) 83-107.El-Sheikh, Ahmed Abdel-Azeem (1987): A Register Approach to the Teaching ofTranslation. Proceedings of the 7thNational Symposium of English Teaching inEgypt, March 24-26, entitled: "Appropriate Methodologies". Cairo: CEDLT, AinShams University.Erer, N. G. (2006). Translation as an Integrated Approach in ELT. Microfilmed M.A.Dissertation. Graduate School of Education, Bilkent University.Gill, S. (1998). Culture matters: Invisible, insane, translating the untranslatable? ModernEnglish Teacher, 7 (3), 63-65.Grellet, F. (1987) Developing Reading Skills: Practical Guide to Reading ComprehensionExercises. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.Halliday, M. & Ruqaiya H. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman. Hickey,Raymond & Stanislaw Puppel (eds.).House, J. & Shoshana, B. K. (1986). (eds.). Interlingual and Intercultural Communication.Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. 20 BUCA EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ 30 (2011)Jakobson R. (1959). On Linguistic Aspects of Translation. In A. R. Brower (Ed.), OnTranslation (pp. 232-39). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Jakobson, R. (2000) [original 1959]. On linguistic Aspects of Translation. In LawrenceVenuti (Ed.) The Translation Studies Reader. London & New York: Routledge, 113-118.Kiraly, C. D. (1995) Models for change. In Kiraly, C., D. (Ed.) Pathways to Translation:Pedagogy and Process. pp.20-35. Ohio: The Kent State University Press.Kiraly, D. C. (1990). A role for communicative competence and the acquisition learningdistinction in translator training. In B. Van Patten and J. Lee, (Eds.). SecondLanguage Acquisition /Foreign Language Learning. Bristol, PA and Clevedon, UK:Multilingual Matters. 207-215. In S. Colina. (2003). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Klein, M. L. (1988). Teaching Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary: A Guide forTeachers. UK: Prentice Hall Publication.Knapp, D. (1980). Developing Reading Comprehension Skills. In Kenneth Croft (Ed.)Readings on English as a Second Language for Teachers and Teacher Trainees. 2nded. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Larson, M. L. (1984). Meaning-based Translation: A Guide to Cross-Language Equivalence.Lanham, MD, University Press of America.Leeman,J., Arteagoitia I., Fridman, B. & Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating Attention to Formwith Meaning: Focus on Form in Content based Spanish Instruction. In Richard W.Schmidt (Eds.) Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning, 217-258.Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‟i, Second Language Teaching and CurriculumCentre.Long, M. 1991. „Focus on Form:Adesign feature in language teaching methodology‟ in K. deBot, R. Ginsberg, and C. Kramsch (eds): Foreign Language Research in CrossculturalPerspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 39–52.Lörscher, W. (1992b). Process-Oriented Research into Translation and its Implications forTranslation Teaching. Interface, Journal for Applied Linguistics, 6 (2), 105–117.21Macizo, P. & Bajo M. T. (2004). When Translation Makes the Difference: SentenceProcessing in Reading and Translation. Psicológica (2004), 25, 181-205.Mahmoud A. (2006) Translation and Foreign Language Reading Comprehension: ANeglected Didactic Procedure. English Teaching Forum, 44 (4).Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. New York: Prentice Hall.Newmeyer, F. (2003). Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage. Language 79: 682-707.Nida, E. A. & Taber, C. R. (1969). The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Nord, C. (1994). Translation as a Process of Linguistic and Cultural Adaptation. In C.Dolleruıp & A. Lindegaard (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpreting 2: Insights,aims, visions. Papers from the second language international conference (pp. 59-68).Ellsinore: John Benjamins.Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis andquantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.Pérez, M. C. (2005). Applying Translation Theory in Teaching. New Voices in TranslationStudies 1 (2005), 1-11.Roberts, J. T. (1982). Recent Developments in ELT-Part II. Language Teaching. 15, 174-187.Schäffner, C. (2004). Developing Professional Translation Competence. In Kirsten Malmkjær(Ed.) Translation in Undergraduate Degree Programmes. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing Company.Spada, N. (1997). Form-Focused Instruction and Second Language Acquisition: A Review ofClassroom and Laboratory Research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87.Steiner, T. R. (1975). English Translation Theory 1650-1800. Assen; Amsterdam: VanGorcum.Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and Options in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.Van Els, T., Bongaerts, T., Extra, G., Van Os, C., & Janssen-van Dieten, A. (1984). AppliedLinguistics and the Learning and Teaching of Foreign Languages. London: EdwardArnold.22Vinay, J. P. & Darbelnet, J. (1977) [originally 1958]. Stylistique comparée du français et del‟anglais. Méthode de traduction. [Com-parative Stylistics of French and English:A Methodology forTranslation]. Nouvelle édition revure et corrige. Montreal:Beauchemin.Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.


Atıf Yapanlar

Gözat Sayfasına Dön

 

Sosyal Medya ve Araçlar

İstatistikler

  • Kayıt
    • Bu ay: 0
    • Toplam: 2710
  • Online
    • Ziyaretçi: 42
    • Üye: 0
    • Toplam: 43

Detaylı İstatistikler