Bu kaydın yasal hükümlere uygun olmadığını düşünüyorsanız lütfen sayfa sonundaki Hata Bildir bağlantısını takip ederek bildirimde bulununuz. Kayıtlar ilgili üniversite yöneticileri tarafından eklenmektedir. Nadiren de olsa kayıtlarla ilgili hatalar oluşabilmektedir. MİTOS internet üzerindeki herhangi bir ödev sitesi değildir!

Implementation of Topic Study Activities in Engineering Education

Oluşturulma Tarihi: 03-06-2015

Niteleme Bilgileri

Tür: Makale

Yayınlanma Durumu: Yayınlanmış

Dosya Biçimi: PDF

Dil: İngilizce

Konu(lar): EĞİTİM, TEKNOLOJİ,

Yazar(lar): Topallı, Damla (Yazar), Çağıltay, Nergiz (Yazar),

Emeği Geçen(ler):

Anahtar Kelimeler

Engineering Education, Problems of Engineering Education, Active Participation in Education, Mühendislik Eğitim, Mühendislik Eğitimi


Özet

Recent studies have shown that, there is a need to propose new approaches and educational methods in order to address current problems of engineering education programs. This study summarized the implementation of a reallife term project and Topic Study concepts in an engineering education course. The curriculum of this course is organized to provide skills on making presentation, research and applying knowledge to solve real-life problems, preparing reports and making discussions on a specific topic. This study describes as a case study how these problems are addressed in an engineering education course namely Data Warehousing and Data Mining. It is aimed to improve students’ motivation and interest to the course as well as to improve their active participation in the course. By this approach it is aimed to help them to construct their own knowledge. This paper also presents the structure of the course and evaluation of grades with the results of a survey on students’ opinion about the real-life term project and Topic Study approaches in this course.


İçindekiler



Açıklamalar



Haklar



Notlar



KaynakçaCagiltay, N.E. (2008). Teaching software engineering by means of computer-game development: Challenges and opportunities.British Journal of Educational Technology. 38(3).Dijk, L. A. V. Berg, G. C.V. D, Keulen, V.H. (2001). Interactive lectures in engineering education, European Journal ofEngineering Education 26(1),15-28.Downey, Gary Lee (2007). Low Cost, Mass Use: American Engineers and the Metrics of Progress. History and Technology Vol.23, No. 3, September 2007, pp. 289–308,Downey, Gary Lee, Juan C. Lucena, and Carl Mitcham (2007). “Engineering Ethics and Identity: Emerging Initiatives inComparative Perspective.” Science and Engineering Ethics 13(December) 4: 463-487.Ellis, J. C. H. (2007). An Assessment of a Self-Directed Learning Approach in a Graduate Web Application Design andDevelopment Course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 50(1).Lucena, J.C. 2007. De criollos a mexicanos: Engineers’s identity and the construction of Mexico. History and Technology 23(3): 275–88.Michael Derntl, Renate Motschnig-Pitrik, Kathrin Figl (2006). “Using Teams, Peer- and Self Evaluation in Blended LearningClasses”, 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.Mishra, Alok, Cagiltay, Nergiz Ercil and Kilic, Ozkan (2007) , ‘Software engineering education: some important dimensions’,European Journal of Engineering Education, 32:3, 349 – 361.Moodle Open Course Ware (2012), Game Programming Course, Accessed from: http://e.atilim.edu.tr/course/view.php?id=140[Last visited August 30 2012].NCR, 2012. The National Research Concil, http://nationalacademies.org/nrc/.Nightingale, P., I. TeWiata, S. Toohey, C. Hughes, G. Ryan, and D. Magin (1995). A resource of improving the practice ofassessment in higher education. Innovations in Education and Training International 32: 302–13.Nordstrom K., Korpelainen, P. (2011). Creativity and inspiration for problem solving in engineering education, Teaching inHigher Education, 16:4, 439-450.Rojter, J. (2006). PBL and Constructivism in Engineering Education, In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual SEFI Conference:Attracting Young People to Engineering. TU Delft, Rotterdam. ISBN 978873520014.Sandra Fernandes, Maria Assunção Flores & Rui Manuel Lima (2012). Students’ views of assessment in project-led engineeringeducation: findings from a case study in Portugal, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37:2, 163-178.Savery, J. R. Duffy, T. M. (2001). CRLT Technical Report No. 16-01. Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and itsconstructivist framework.Schilling, J., Klamma, R. (2010). The difficult bridge between university and industry: a case study in computer scienceteaching, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35:4, 367-380.Sztipanovits, Z., Biswas, G., Framton, K., Gokhale, A., Howard, H., Karsai, G., KOO, T.J., Koutsoukos, X., Schmidt, D.C.(2005). Introducing Embedded Software and Systems Education and Advanced Learning Technology in an EngineeringCurriculum, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 4(3), pp 549–568.Wulf, W. A., & G. M. C. Fisher. (2002). A makeover for engineering education. Issues in Science and Technology, Online,(Spring 2002).


Atıf Yapanlar

Gözat Sayfasına Dön

 

Sosyal Medya ve Araçlar

İstatistikler

  • Kayıt
    • Bu ay: 0
    • Toplam: 2441
  • Online
    • Ziyaretçi: 46
    • Üye: 0
    • Toplam: 46

Detaylı İstatistikler