Bu kaydın yasal hükümlere uygun olmadığını düşünüyorsanız lütfen sayfa sonundaki Hata Bildir bağlantısını takip ederek bildirimde bulununuz. Kayıtlar ilgili üniversite yöneticileri tarafından eklenmektedir. Nadiren de olsa kayıtlarla ilgili hatalar oluşabilmektedir. MİTOS internet üzerindeki herhangi bir ödev sitesi değildir!

Paper-Based versus Computer-Based Testing in Engineering Education

Oluşturulma Tarihi: 02-06-2015

Niteleme Bilgileri

Tür: Makale

Yayınlanma Durumu: Yayınlanmış

Dosya Biçimi: Dosya Yok

Dil: İngilizce

Konu(lar): EĞİTİM, TEKNOLOJİ,

Yazar(lar): Özalp Yaman, Şeniz (Yazar), Çağıltay, Nergiz (Yazar),

Emeği Geçen(ler):




Dosya:
Dosya Yok

Anahtar Kelimeler

Computer based exams, Test-Mode Effect, Paper-and-pencil Based Exams, Engineering education, Bilgisayar destekli sınavlar, test-Mod Etkisi, Kağıt ve kalem Tabanlı Sınavlar, mühendislik eğitimi


Özet

Using computers for assessment can provide several benefits for educators and test-takers. However, in the literature, there is no consensus on the equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-based test environments. Accordingly, more evidences are needed especially for the engineering education. In this study, students' performance on different test modes was evaluated on 209 first year engineering students of a chemistry course. The results of this study showed that, there is no significant performance difference between paper-and-pencil and computer based tests. By comparing results with the previous studies, this study concludes that, personal characteristics of test takers, the features of computer-based testing systems and the test content are all possible confounding factors when comparing test modes and need to be considered by the implementers. The results of this study show that, once these factors are controlled, students' performance on computer-based tests and paper-and-pencil tests in chemistry courses for the engineering students will not vary. This finding is encouraging the educators to get benefits of computer-based tests without any affect on students' performance.


İçindekiler



Açıklamalar



Haklar



Notlar



KaynakçaBrown, G., Race, P. & Bull, J. (1999). Computer-assisted assessment in higher education. Kogan Page: London Ashcroft, K. & Palacio, D. (1996). Researching into assessment and evaluation in colleges and universities. London, UK: Kogan Page Bugbee, Jr. A. C. (1.996). The equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-based testing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(3), 282-299. Sawaki, Y. (2001): "Comparability of conventional and computerized tests of reading in a second language". Language learning & Technology, 5 (2): 38-59. Ricketts, C. & Wilks, S.J. (2002). Improving Student Performance Through Computer-based Assessment: insights from recent research. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 27, No. 5,2002. Schaeffer, G.A., Reese, C.M., Steffen, M., McKinley R.L., & Mills, C.N. (1993). Field test of computer-based GRE general test ETS Research report #93-07 (ERIC #ED385588). Finegan, J.E. & Allen, N.J. (1994) Computerised, and written questionnaires: are they equivalent?, Computers in Human Behaviour, 10, pp. 483-496. Russell, M., & Haney, B. (1997). Testing Writing on Computers: An Experiment Comparing Students Performance on. Test Conducted via Computer and via Paper-and-Pencil. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5(3), 1-19. Mason, B.J., Patry, M., & Berstein, D.J. (2001). An Examination of the equivalence between non-adaptive computer-based and traditional, testing, Journal of educational Computing Research 24 (1) 29-39. (Pubitemid 33403230) [CrossRef] Weinberg, A. (2001). Comparaison de deux versions d'une test de classement: Version papier-crayon et version, informatisee [Comparison, of two versions of a placement test: Paper-pencil version and computer-based version], Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 607-627. Bodmann, S.M. & Robinson, D.H. (2004). Speed and Performance Differences Among computer-based and paper-pencil tests, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1) 51-60, 2004 Campton, P. (2004). A Comparative Analysis Of Online And Paper-Based Assessment Methods: A University Case Study. ACEC 2004, Conference Proceedings. Euzent, P.J., Putchinski, L., Moskal, P. & Martin, T.L. (2005). Further Evidence on the Effectiveness of WebCT Versus Paper Testing, 7th Annual WebCT User Conference. Ashton, H.S., Beevers, C.E., Korabinski, A.A., & Youngson, M.A. (2005). Investigating the medium effect in computer-aided assessment of school Chemistry and college Computing national examinations, British Journal of Educational Technology 36(5) 771-787, 2005. Russell, M. (1999). Testing on computers: A follow-up study comparing performance on computer and on paper. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7, 20. Lee, G. & Weerakoon, P. (2001). The role of computer-aided assessment in health professional education: a comparison of student performance in computer-based and paper-and-pen multiple-choice tests, Medical Teacher, Vol. 23, No. 2, 152-157. (Pubitemid 32288377) [CrossRef] Bugbee, Jr., A. C., & Bernt, F. M. (1.990). Testing by computer: Findings in six years of use 1982-1988. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23, 87-101. Bocij, C., & Greasley, A. (1999). Can computer-based testing achieve quality and efficiency in assessment? International Journal of Educational Technology, 1, nl. Clariana, R. & Wallace, Patricia (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect, British Journal of Educational technology, 33(5), 593-602. [CrossRef] Pomplun, M., Frey, S., & Becker, D. F. (2002). The score equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of a speeded test of reading comprehension. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 337-354. (Pubitemid 36688805) [CrossRef] Sutton, R.E. (1.991). Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 475-503. Parshall, C. & Kromery, J.D. (1.993). Computer testing versus paper-and-pencil testing: An analysis of examinee characteristics associated with mode effect. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American. Educational Research Association. Atlanta, GA. (1.2-16 April, 1993). Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes towards computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 147-158. [CrossRef] Lynch, C. D., Whitley, T. W., Emmerling, D. A. & Brinn, J. E. (2000). Variables That May Enhance Medical Students' Perceived Preparedness for computer-based testing, The Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 7(5); 469-474. [CrossRef] Perkins, B. (1993). Differences between Computer Administered and Paper Administered Computer Anxiety and Performance Measures. Unpublished Research Report. ED 355905. Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S. (1989). Research on the effects of administering tests via computers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8(3), 5-10. [CrossRef] Noyes, J., Garland, K., & Robbins, L. (2004). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Is workload another test mode effect? British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 1,111-113. [CrossRef] Ashton, H. S., Beevers, CE., Korabinski, A. A. (2006). Incorporating partial credit in computer-aided assessment of Mathematics in secondary education, British Journal of Educational Technology 37(1) 93-119,2006. [CrossRef] Al-Othman, (2003). The relationship between online reading rates and performance on proficiency tests". The Reading Matrix, 3(3).


Atıf Yapanlar

Gözat Sayfasına Dön

 

Sosyal Medya ve Araçlar

İstatistikler

  • Kayıt
    • Bu ay: 3
    • Toplam: 2417
  • Online
    • Ziyaretçi: 15
    • Üye: 0
    • Toplam: 15

Detaylı İstatistikler